Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Abstract Mineral scaling represents a major constraint that limits the efficiency of membrane desalination, which is becoming increasingly important for achieving sustainable water supplies in the context of a changing climate. Different mineral scales can be formed via distinct mechanisms that lead to a significant variation of scaling behaviors and mitigation strategies. In this article, we present a comprehensive review that thoroughly compares gypsum scaling and silica scaling, which are two common scaling types formed via crystallization and polymerization respectively, in membrane desalination. We show that the differences between scale formation mechanisms greatly affect the thermodynamics, kinetics, and mineral morphology of gypsum scaling and silica scaling. Then we review the literatures on the distinct behaviors of gypsum scaling and silica scaling during various membrane desalination processes, examining their varied damaging effects on desalination efficiency. We further scrutinize the different interactions of gypsum and silica with organic foulants, which result in contrasting consequences of combined scaling and fouling. In addition, the distinctive mitigation strategies tailored to controlling gypsum scaling and silica scaling, including scaling-resistant membrane materials, antiscalants, and pretreatment, are discussed. We conclude this article with the research needs of attaining a better understanding of different mineral scaling types, aiming to inspire researchers to take scale formation mechanism into consideration when developing more effective approaches of scaling control in membrane desalination.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available January 1, 2026
-
Zero liquid discharge (ZLD) and minimal liquid discharge (MLD) are brine management approaches that aim to reduce the environmental impacts of brine discharge and recover water for reuse. ZLD maximizes water recovery and avoids the needs for brine disposal, but is expensive and energy-intensive. MLD (which reduces the brine volume and recovers some water) has been proposed as a practical and cost-effective alternative to ZLD, but brine disposal is needed. In this Review, we examine the concepts, technologies and industrial applications of ZLD and MLD. These brine management strategies have current and potential applications in the desalination, energy, mining and semiconductor industries, all of which produce large volumes of brine. Brine concentration and crystallization in ZLD and MLD often rely on mechanical vapour compression and thermal crystallizers, which are effective but energy-intensive. Novel engineered systems for brine volume reduction and crystallization are under active development to achieve MLD and/or ZLD. These emerging systems, such as membrane distillation, electrodialytic crystallization and solvent extraction desalination, still face challenges to outcompete mechanical vapour compression and thermal crystallizers, underscoring the critical need to maximize the full potential of reverse osmosis to attain ultrahigh water recovery. Brine valorization has potential to partially offset the cost of ZLD and MLD, provided that resource recovery can be integrated into treatment trains economically and in accordance with regulations.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available March 1, 2026
-
Silica scaling is a major type of mineral scaling that significantly constrains the performance and efficiency of membrane desalination. While antiscalants have been commonly used to control mineral scaling formed via crystallization, there is a lack of antiscalants for silica scaling due to its unique formation mechanism of polymerization. In this study, we performed a systematic study that investigated and compared antiscalants with different functional groups and molecular weights for mitigating silica scaling in membrane distillation (MD) and reverse osmosis (RO). The efficiencies of these antiscalants were tested in both static experiments (for hindering silicic acid polymerization) as well as crossflow, dynamic MD and RO experiments (for reducing water flux decline). Our results show that antiscalants enriched with strong H-accepters and H-donors were both able to hinder silicic acid polymerization efficiently in static experiments, with their antiscaling performance being a function of both molecular functionality and weight. Although poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) with abundant H-accepters exhibited high antiscaling efficiencies during static experiments, it displayed limited performance of mitigating silica scaling during MD and RO. Poly (ethylene glycol) diamine (PEGD), which has a PEG backbone but is terminated by two amino groups, was efficient to both hinder silicic acid polymerization and reduce water flux decline in MD and RO. Antiscalants enriched with H-donors, such as poly(ethylenimine) (PEI) and poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM), were effective of extending the water recovery of MD but conversely facilitated water flux decline of RO in the presence of supersaturated silica. Further analyses of silica scales formed on the membrane surfaces confirmed that the antiscalants interacted with silica via hydrogen bonding and showed that the presence of antiscalants governed the silica morphology. Our work indicates that discrepancy in antiscalant efficiency exists between static experiments and dynamic membrane filtration as well as between different membrane processes associated with silica scaling, providing valuable insights on the design principle and mechanisms of antiscalants tailored to silica scaling.more » « less
-
This study examined how medical and social work students perceive and process feedback during a post-simulation debrief session. A novel methodology was employed for multimodal sentiment analysis, which consists of gathering sentiments from videos (n=113) by fusing audio, visual, and textual data features. Results indicate that most students expressed positive or negative deactivating emotions when reflecting on their performance. Evaluating and looking for alternatives were the most frequent reflective behaviors with few occurrences of looking forward behaviors.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

Full Text Available